In today’s digitized environment, multi-factor authentication (MFA) has become an essential component in securing access to cloud applications, enterprise systems, and sensitive data. While Okta has emerged as a popular identity and access management solution, several organizations explore alternatives due to pricing, specific features, or integration needs. Understanding how these Okta alternatives handle MFA is crucial for making informed security decisions.
Multi-factor authentication typically involves two or more of the following factors:
- Something you know (e.g., passwords, PINs)
- Something you have (e.g., mobile phone, hardware token)
- Something you are (e.g., fingerprint, facial recognition)
Let’s explore how some reputable Okta alternatives approach MFA.
1. Microsoft Entra ID (formerly Azure Active Directory)
Microsoft’s identity platform is a strong Okta alternative, especially for enterprises heavily invested in Microsoft ecosystems. Microsoft Entra ID provides built-in MFA through Azure Multi-Factor Authentication, which includes:
- Phone calls and SMS
- Push notifications via Microsoft Authenticator
- Biometric-based sign-ins using Windows Hello
Administrators can enforce policies using Conditional Access, allowing MFA to be applied based on user risk, location, or device compliance. Additionally, Microsoft integrates seamlessly with Microsoft 365 and hundreds of other SaaS apps.
2. Duo Security (by Cisco)
Duo Security is a highly-regarded solution focused exclusively on MFA and access control. It offers:
- Push-based authentication through the Duo Mobile app
- Passcodes generated within the app
- Biometrics and security keys (e.g., YubiKey)
Duo shines in environments demanding granular access control and high usability. Policies can be tailored by group, device health, or behavioral patterns. It also supports out-of-band authentication methods and integrates with VPNs, cloud services, and both Windows and UNIX-based systems.
The solution is particularly attractive to organizations seeking a standalone MFA platform with comprehensive analytics and endpoint visibility.
3. Auth0
Auth0, now a part of Okta but still operating as a distinct platform, boasts flexibility and developer-friendliness. It supports multiple MFA methods, including:
- Time-based One-Time Password (TOTP)
- Push notifications using Guardian (Auth0’s app)
- SMS and voice call verification
- Biometric authentication via WebAuthn
What sets Auth0 apart is its modular architecture. MFA can be triggered based on a range of custom rules and conditions via Auth0’s “Rules” scripting engine. This allows organizations to embed advanced logic, such as requiring MFA only for logins from new devices or geographic regions.
4. JumpCloud
JumpCloud is gaining traction as a directory platform for managing identity, device, and access controls—particularly in hybrid or cross-OS environments. Its MFA capabilities include:
- Push notifications
- TOTP through apps like Google Authenticator
- SSH key-based and passwordless authentication
JumpCloud integrates MFA directly into user login workflows for endpoints (Windows, macOS, Linux), as well as applications and networks via RADIUS and LDAP connectors. The platform supports Passwordless Authentication, aligning with zero-trust principles.
5. Ping Identity
Ping Identity offers enterprise-grade identity solutions with a focus on large-scale deployments and hybrid-cloud architectures. PingOne MFA and PingID support:
- App-based push notifications
- SMS and voice
- Biometrics through mobile devices
- FIDO2/WebAuthn for passwordless login
Ping’s adaptive authentication features analyze user behavior, device reputation, and contextual signals to tailor the MFA challenge dynamically. This ensures minimal friction for legitimate users while maintaining a high security posture.
Conclusion
Each Okta alternative provides robust multi-factor authentication capabilities, but with variations in flexibility, integration, and ease of use. While Microsoft Entra ID and Ping Identity shine in enterprise settings, Duo and JumpCloud are well-suited for organizations seeking dedicated MFA or broader device-level control. Auth0 is ideal for developers needing flexible identity workflows.
Ultimately, selecting the right MFA solution depends on an organization’s existing infrastructure, user base, preferred authentication methods, and future scalability requirements. Evaluating these factors, alongside cost and compliance needs, will guide a successful shift from Okta or any identity management platform.
